Taru Pallav Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court) Hon. Gujarat High Court quashes Section 148 notice along with order under section 148A(d) for AY 2013-14, Post SC decision in UOI vs. Ashish Agrawal 1. The petitioner seeks to challenge the notice issued under Section-148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 30.06.2021. In […]
Rupesh Vyas Vs ACIT (ITAT Indore) Feeling aggrieved by appeal-order dated 20.09.2018 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-1, Indore [“Ld. CIT(A)”], which in turn arises out of assessment-order dated 15.12.2016 passed by the learned ACIT-3(1), Indore [“Ld. AO”] u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act] for Assessment-Year 2014-15, the assessee has filed […]
Higher rate of tax was prescribed in section 115BBE through an amendment made vide Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Act, 2016 and the said amendment received assent of the President of India on 15.12.2016 and therefore the amendment shall apply prospectively w.e.f. 15.12.2016 and not retrospectively.
M.P. Police Sakh Sahkari Sanstha Maryadit Vs PCIT (ITAT Indore) Co-operative societies engaged in banking business are eligible for deduction u/s. 80P on their interest income from bank deposits- ITAT Indore Facts of the Case 1. The assessee is a co-operative society engaged in the business of banking which filed ITR claiming deduction u/s 80P. […]
Section 80AC contemplates denial of deduction in respect of certain provisions of Chapter VI ‘A’ of the Act, if ITR is not filed. Those provisions do not apply to the claim for deduction u/s. 80P.
Cemetile Industries Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) These appeals by different assessees are directed against the confirmation of disallowance u/s.36(1)(va) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ’the Act’) made in the Intimations issued u/s.143(1) of the Act or thereafter its confirmation in the respective rectification orders for the assessment years 2017-18 to 2020-21. Due […]
SC upholds Central Government decision on demonetisation of 500 & 1000 rupee notes by a Majority of 4:1 in the case of Vivek Narayan Sharma Vs. Union Of India.
ITAT Mumbai ruled on 07/12/2022 in the case of P R Packaging Service Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Appeal No. ITA 2376/Mum/2022 on employee’s contribution to Provident Fund. Find out the ruling!
Cash receipt by ‘Co-op. Society’ from dealer across multiple days not to be aggregated for Sec. 269ST purpose: CBDT Reference was received by the CBDT as to whether receipt of cash by Co-operative Societies from a distributor for the sale of milk on a bank holiday or a day when the bank is closed should […]
ITAT held that ITR is a sacred document prescribed in law and reporting-error cannot be pleaded so lightly. The prescribed forms of ITR have suitable columns to furnish the details of cash-balance, this law procedure has been in statute for several years and nobody can dispute it.
