Delhi High Court held that charges relating to clandestine removal and undervaluation of goods cannot be sustained merely on the basis of assumptions and presumptions. Accordingly, addition rightly deleted.
ITAT Bangalore held that addition under section 69 of the Income Tax Act unjustified as source of fund duly explained. Rejection of the explanation relating to source of fund by the department without sufficient reason is unsustainable in law.
ITAT Delhi held that genuineness and veracity of the party cannot be doubted merely because the cold storage rent was received in cash. Accordingly, addition u/s. 69 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained investment unjustified.
ITAT Delhi held that addition u/s. 69 of the Income Tax Act based on working/ seized document retrieved from third person without granting cross examination opportunity to the assessee is unsustainable in law.
Calcutta High Court held that power to issue supplementary show cause notice, prior to insertion of second proviso to section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962, was implicit and inbuilt in section 124 of the Act. Thus, supplementary notice issued prior to 29.03.2018 i.e. insertion of second proviso is duly valid in law.
Madras High Court held that digital data collected by the department in the course of search and seizure without following the Digital Evidence Investigation Manual issued by CBDT makes the entire search and seizure unsustainable and ab initio bad
ITAT Delhi held that assessee qualifying as an eligible assessee, AO is mandatory required to first pass a draft assessment order as per section 144C(1) of the Income Tax Act. Passing of assessment order without following the mandatory requirement results in invalidation of final assessment order.
ITAT Delhi held that statutory approval given by a quasi judicial authority (here, JCIT) without due application of mind as contemplated in section 153D of the Income Tax Act would be fatal to the entire search assessment proceedings.
ITAT Delhi held that revisional jurisdiction u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act not invocable in absence of any error or infirmity in the assessment order which could make the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue.
Madras High Court held that valid ITC availed on purchase tax which remained unutilized is entitled for the transitional credit under section 140 of TNGST Act, 2017
