Bridgekala Luxurious Lifestyle Management Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Another (Delhi High Court)
Introduction: In the case of Bridgekala Luxurious Lifestyle Management Private Limited vs Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax, the Delhi High Court tackled the contentious issue of retrospective cancellation of GST registration. This article delves into the judgment dated 02.2023, highlighting the key arguments, considerations, and the court’s modified order.
Detailed Analysis:
1. Background of the Case:
- Petitioner challenges the retrospective cancellation of GST registration.
- Show Cause Notice cites failure to furnish returns for a continuous period of six months.
- Petitioner argues the inability to file returns due to an accountant’s lapse.
2. Impugned Order and Reasons:
- Order retrospectively cancels registration from 11.01.2020.
- Show Cause Notice does not indicate the intention for retrospective cancellation.
- Petitioner contends the cancellation should have been effective from the date of the show cause notice.
3. Legal Framework – Section 29(2) of CGST Act:
- Section 29(2) empowers the proper officer to cancel GST registration.
- Registration can be canceled from any retrospective date based on circumstances deemed fit.
- Court emphasizes the need for objective criteria in deeming it fit for retrospective cancellation.
4. Objective Criteria for Retrospective Cancellation:
Paid content
Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.
