Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rajnikant Punjalal Shah Karta of Rajnikant Punjalal Shah HUF  Vs Manager, Bank of Baroda (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : R/Special Civil Application No. 10377 of 2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/06/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Rajnikant Punjalal Shah Karta of Rajnikant Punjalal Shah HUF  Vs Manager, Bank of Baroda (Gujarat High Court)

HC held that It is not in dispute that respondent Bank have withdrawn/debited amount of Rs.85,380/- from the PPF Account of the petitioner. It is well settled proposition of law that the amount of Public Provident Fund account shall not be liable to any attachment in respect of any debt or liability incurred by the account holder. Thus, the action of the respondent Bank of withdrawing/debiting the aforesaid amount from the PPF Account of the petitioner is illegal and unjustified.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF GUJARAT HIGH COURT

1. Rule. Learned advocate Ms.Nalini Lodha waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent-Bank.

2. The Brief facts of the case are as under:

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031