Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Ankit Naresh Tulsian (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Ankit Naresh Tulsian (ITAT Pune) Penny Stock Allegation Falls Flat – SEBI Final Report Saves the Day- Reopening on Same Facts = Change of Opinion: ITAT Quashes 148 & Deletes ₹1 Cr Addition Revenue appealed deletion of ₹1,00,08,500 added u/s 69A on the allegation that LTCG from sale of 2,00,000 shares of Mishkafin Finance & Trading Ltd. (MFTL) was bogus. AO relied on SEBI’s interim order alleging price rigging & treated the LTCG exempt u/s 10(38) as unexplained money taxable u/s 115BBE. CIT(A) examined extensive documents—contract notes, demat statements, bank e...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Vague Purpose in Form 10? ITAT Gives Trust a Second Chance Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Late Form 67 – Bang ITAT Allows Substantive Relief CIT(A) Cannot Enhance on New Issue; JDA Additions & U/s 2(22)(e) Deletions Upheld No Exempt Income = No U/s 14A Disallowance – ITAT Bangalore Reaffirms Settled Law View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930