The issue involved limited validity of norms for Advance Authorisation. The amendment extends validity to 2028, ensuring continuity and reducing compliance burden.
The consultation paper proposes allowing OBPPs to offer products regulated by IFSCA. It aligns with broader efforts to enhance cross-border investment opportunities. The proposal also ensures compliance with foreign exchange rules.
The consultation paper issued by Securities and Exchange Board of India seeks public comments on a draft circular proposing to extend the benefit of early pay-in (EPI) in the commodity derivatives segment to options contracts, in addition to its current applicability to futures contracts. Under the existing framework prescribed in the SEBI Master Circular dated […]
The Tribunal found that the transfer pricing adjustment was incorrectly computed using SEB sale rates. It allowed deduction based on consumer tariff rates. The decision clarifies benchmarking for captive consumption.
The court held that initiating proceedings under the penalty provision for alleged excess stock discovered during a survey was improper. It ruled that such cases must be dealt with under assessment provisions, leading to quashing of the order.
The Court examined whether Section 130 could be used when discrepancies were found during a GST survey. It held that the correct legal route is Sections 73/74 and reinforced settled precedents.
The Court examined whether confiscation proceedings under Section 130 were valid for alleged excess stock found during a survey. It held that the law mandates action under Sections 73/74, rendering the orders unsustainable.
The Court examined whether Section 130 proceedings were valid when excess stock was found during a survey. It held that such cases must be dealt with under Sections 73/74, rendering the penalty order unsustainable.
The court held that tax determination must follow Sections 73 or 74 and cannot be replaced by Section 130 proceedings. It found the action legally unsustainable. The ruling reinforces procedural compliance under GST law.
The issue involved allegations of mismanagement framed under company law provisions. The Tribunal held that the core dispute arose from contractual obligations under a term sheet. It referred the matter to arbitration, emphasizing that such disputes must follow agreed dispute resolution mechanisms.
