The Tribunal held that courses imparting practical skills qualify as vocational training even without guaranteed employment, allowing exemption under the notification.
The Tribunal found that the assessee had furnished agricultural sale bills, revenue records, and bank details supporting the cash deposits. Considering the facts and circumstances, only a partial addition was sustained.
The NCLT Bengaluru admitted insolvency proceedings against the Corporate Debtor after finding that loan documents, statements of accounts, and recall notices established existence of debt and default. The Tribunal held that once default is proved under Section 7 of the IBC, admission of the petition follows.
The Delhi High Court held that CBDT Circular dated 18.11.2024 clearly prescribed a maximum period of three years from the end of the relevant assessment year for seeking condonation of delay. Since the application for AY 2020-21 was filed after 31.03.2024, the Court upheld its rejection as time-barred.
Alternative Investment Funds provide access to private equity, startups, infrastructure, and high-growth investment opportunities beyond traditional instruments. This guide explains how AIFs work and who should invest in them.
The Central Government has authorized the GSTAT Principal Bench, New Delhi, to hear appeals under Section 101B of the CGST Act. The notification gives retrospective effect from 1 April 2026 and strengthens the GST appellate mechanism.
SEBI stated that improved cyber resilience, alternate trading sites, and contingency trading frameworks made the IRRA platform unnecessary. The circular supersedes the earlier 2022 framework establishing the platform.
The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to serious procedural lapses. IBBI emphasized strict adherence to timelines under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
The Gujarat High Court upheld the ITAT order restricting disallowance on alleged bogus purchases to 6% instead of 100%. The Court held that only the income component embedded in disputed transactions could be taxed.
Gujarat High Court held that reassessment proceedings could not continue where Revenue failed to establish any independent material connecting assessee to alleged cash transactions. Section 148 notice based solely on a broker’s seized register was quashed.
