Ensure compliance with Section 338 of Companies Act 2013. Proper accounts should be kept to avoid liability & fines. Follow the Act’s rules & regulations & review records regularly.
Learn how Section 339 of the Companies Act 2013 addresses fraudulent conduct of business in India. Analysis of implications & effects on shareholders & stakeholders.
Explore the key considerations and challenges related to Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) in this article. Learn about patentability and copyright protection for AI-generated works. two uses of ‘Artificial intelligence and IPR (Intellectual Property Rights)
Held that, assessment proceedings suffer from serious procedural errors in absence of a proper SCN, where there were serious discrepancies in the proceedings. Thus, entire proceedings are vitiated.
HC quashed and set aside SCN and consequential GST registration cancellation order on ground of violation of principles of natural justice as no reasonable opportunity of hearing was given to assessee.
Held that, an unsigned notice/order cannot be considered as an order and hence cannot be sustained. Further, directed the assessee to submit the reply within 2 weeks and directed the Revenue Department to pass the fresh orders after the assessee has been heard.
Reverse lifting of corporate veils is a relatively new concept in company law and is slowly becoming the chosen method of dealing with the personal liabilities of shareholders who have committed fraud. But I will be arguing in my paper that the doctrine is far from capable of dealing with cases of fraud of shareholders who use companies as alter egos.
Fulfill your payment obligations to the supplier within 180 days & save yourself from legal & financial repercussions. Non-payment of consideration within 180 days can put traders in big trouble – ITC not eligible as per Section 16(2)(d).
These regulations may be called the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Real Estate Investment Trusts) (Amendment) Regulations, 2023.
Manipur High Court held that the benefit of HRA is for the welfare of the families of the employees who are posted in difficult stations like the North Eastern region. Accordingly, denial of benefit of HRA/ additional HRA to Central Government employees posed in NE region who had kept his family in previous place is unjustified.
