ITAT not agreed with Conclusion that whatever income was shown in Form 26AS under assess’s PAN is his income
No service tax on composite works contract services of supply of goods/deemed supply of goods & services under any head before 1.6.2007
Withholding certificate at a low tax rate rejected for huge outstanding demand, although same were due to pending rectification applications
If no incriminating material found during Income Tax search in respect of an issue, no addition for such issue can be made Sections 153A/153C
PLA deposits are deposits for utilisation in future & same is not duty to attract limitation provision of section 11B of Central Excise Act
HC Quashed GST SCN not indicating contravention committed by petitioner & issued in a format without striking off irrelevant particulars
Addition by AO without providing any cogent reasoning or working, based on which such disallowances were made are not sustainable.
Asessee has failed to appear on 8 occasions before the ld. CIT(A). Conduct of assessee is clogging justice delivery system. Hence, ITAT directed the assessee to pay Rs.10,000/- to Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund
Disputed demand has arisen for failure of Tata Teleservices to deduct tax at source on interest payments made to China Development Bank
Explore the concept of One Nation One Housing Policy and its role in RERA & RBI regulations. Learn about the impact on housing loans and vouchers.