Held that in the present case the approving authority has acted casually and granted the approval u/s. 153D in a mechanical manner without judicious exercise of power. According, approval granted u/s 153D was quashed and consequently the assessment order u/s 153A was also quashed.
Held that there is no material/ evidence to say that the assessee was having any business connection in India. Addition unsustainable.
Purulia Metal Casting Pvt. Ltd Vs Assistant Commissioner of State Tax (Calcutta High Court) By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned action of recovery of the demand arising out of the adjudication order dated 14th December, 2021 by debiting from its electronic credit ledger such demand on 30th December, 2021 in violation of […]
It is held that the Penalty Notice is defective, therefore, the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, is not maintainable.
Date for the purpose of quantifying the stamp duty payable on the instrument is the date on which the instrument was signed
Be cautious! Your social media posts can lead to GST liabilities. Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled on a case where an event management service provider faced GST demand based on social media posts. Understand the implications and ensure responsible use of social media to avoid tax litigation.
T P D 101 Uthangarai Milk- Producers Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) The assessee supposed to have been filed audit report as required u/s.44AB of the Act, on or before 31.10.2015. However, such audit report has been filed on 05.03.2016, which is before the date of completion of assessment proceedings u/s.143(3) of the […]
ACIT Vs Ecocat India Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) There is no quarrel on the proposition that the DSIR has approved the weighted deduction for capital expenses. Those expenses were in a sum of Rs. 2,97,57,596/- which is acknowledged in the assessment order by the AO. What has not been permitted u/s 35(2AB) of the Act […]
CIT Vs ITC Limited (Calcutta High Court) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Ld. Tribunal has erred in law in allowing the claim of the assessee for deduction under Section 80IC of the I.T. Act, 1961, amounting to Rs.72,21,948/- by disregarding that the captive undertaking is not entitled to […]
Cochin University of Science and Technology Vs DR. P. V. SASIKUMAR (Kerala High Court) The Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Act, 2009, widened the definition of ’employee’ under the Act in order to extend the benefit to the teachers with effect from the date on which the provisions of the Act were made applicable to educational […]
