Till further orders, all documents/ not summons/Daks through physical mode be dispensed with, except where there, is a specific order to that effect by the Hon’ble Court, and that such service be instead permitted to be effected through e-mail/fax/whatsapp.
Jaya Prakash Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Admittedly in this case, the CIT(A) determined the sale consideration on the basis of Form 26AS without seeing the actual sale deed entered by the assessee with concerned parties. In our opinion, sale consideration cannot be determined only on the basis of Form 26AS. The provisions of s.2(47)(v) can […]
Office Order No.103 of 2021 [Extension of ad-hoc appointment to the grade of JCIT from 01.01.2021 to 31.12.2021 or till these officers are appointed to the grade of JCIT on regular basis, whichever is earlier] F. No. A-3201211212019-Ad.VI Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue (Central Board of Direct Taxes} ***** North Block, […]
ACIT Vs Metric Stream Infotech (India) Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Banglore) There is a categorical finding returned by Ld.CIT(A) that assessee was unable to get loan from Citibank for meeting the expenses and Citibank also refused to extend the loan. Subsequently assessee was waiting for funds from the principle which was received only after 31/03/2013 by […]
1. Section 26 of Maharashtra VAT Act (MVAT Act) was amended by the State Legislature on 15 April 2017, by which condition of pre-deposit of certain percentage of disputed tax amount at the time of filing 1st and 2nd appeals was introduced. 2. Sub-sections (6A), (6B) and (6C) to Section 26 read as under: “26. […]
High Court on its own motion Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors. (Bombay High Court) FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER of BOMBAY HIGH COURT This Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation is initiated Re: the rise in COVID-19 Virus cases in March-April 2021 in the prisons in the State of Maharashtra. 2. Newspaper reports, more particularly, […]
Blackberry Tradecom Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) We find that the ld. CIT(A) has passed an ex-parte order as the assessee had not responded to the notices of hearing on 09.03.2017 and 14.03.2017. The AO also passed an order u/s 144 of the Act. The ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that notice of […]
In re Court On Its Own Motion (Bombay High Court) FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER of BOMBAY HIGH COURT The second wave of the pandemic, arising out of COVID-19 virus, has been wreaking havoc just as the first wave did in the year that went by. To combat the rising second wave, the Government of Maharashtra […]
Dell International Services India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) We find that the appeals were listed for hearing and adjourned and the delay for non-disposal of the appeals is not attributable to the assessee. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and following the decision rendered by Hon’ble Delhi High Court in […]
ACIT Vs M/s. Sattva Developers Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata) From the entry made on 06-09-2011, it would be found that the Authorised Representative filed all the details excepting the explanation regarding treatment of compensation, and for this purpose the hearing was adjourned to 13-09-2011. The next entry on 19-09-2011 inter alia reads that the Authorised […]
