M/s Navodaya Education Trust Vs Sri. Sunki Rajender Reddy (Karnataka High Court) The petitioner – Trust in question having the cloak of an Educational Trust, to enjoy the exemption from Income Tax obtained the approval under Section 10(23-C) of the Act, was thoroughly misused and abused by the Trustees who appear to be Members of […]
In the year 2012, the then Government had introduced retrospective amendments to the Indian Income- tax Act in order to nullify the decision rendered by the Apex Court in the case of Vodafone International Holdings B.V. vs Union of India with regard to taxation of indirect transfer of shares.
Arjuna, In this year, main focus was on Direct taxes rather than indirect taxes. The government has suggested certain changes in the income tax rate and deductions from the total income. In this budget, the government has focused on deduction provisions in case of senior citizen.
On the facts and circumstanced of the case, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in law in deleting the addition of Rs. 2,21,09,600 holding that the provision of section 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be invoked in this case when there was a transfer of immovable property in view of the provisions of section 2(47)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in holding that Rule 8D cannot be invoked in the case of the assessee and in directing the A.O. to delete the addition of Rs.3,55,234/- made u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D.
These two appeals have been filed by the appellant against the common impugned order dated 2.8.2017 passed by the Commissioner (A) whereby the Commissioner (A) has disposed of four Orders-in-Original.
The appeal by the Revenue is against order dated 27.04.2012 of Commissioner of Service Tax, New Delhi. By the said order, he original authority dropped the entire demand of Service Tax of Rs.93,01,154/-covering the period 2006-07 to 2008-09 with reference to construction project of Delhi Haat in INA and Pitampura .
There is no legal distinction between the powers and duties of executive directors and non-executive directors, the two play different roles on a board of directors. Even u/s 166 of Companies Act, 2013 duties of directors are prescribed which are equal for both executive and non-executive Director.
Any Company which intended to make any change to the Memorandum of Association (MOA) of its company, will have to comply with the provisions of Section- 13 of Companies Act, 2013 and any other applicable provisions of the Act and applicable rules.
MCA issued Companies (Incorporation) Amendment, Rules, 2018 vide notification dated 20.01.2018 these rules are effective from 26th January, 2018. By these amendment Rules MCA has substituted Rule 9 of Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014.
