Likewise, in the matter of Shankara Cooperative Housing Society Limited v. M. Prabhakar and others, the Supreme Court has held that delay and laches is one of the factors that requires to be borne in mind by the High Courts when they exercise their discretionary power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Notification No. 92/2015 – Income Tax Statement under sub-section (7) of section 115UB. 12CB.(1) The statement of income paid or credited by an investment fund to its unit holder shall be furnished by the person responsible for crediting or making payment of the income on behalf of an investment fund and the investment fund to the- (i) unit holder by 30th day of June of the financial year following the previous year during which the income is paid or credited in Form No. 64C, duly verified by the person paying or crediting the income on behalf of the investment fund in the manner indicated therein; and
Legal Objective of the Act: To regulate the acceptance and utilisation of FC/donations or foreign hospitality by certain individuals or associations or companies; and To prohibit acceptance and qutilisation of FC/donations or foreign hospitality for any activities detrimental to the national interest and matters connected thereto. It Applies to whole of India including (also applies […]
Punjab and Haryana High Court held In the case of ADIT vs. Sh. Dhan Singh Sharma that ld counsel for the applicant admitted at the time of arguments that statement was re-started after some time on the same day.
The following Companies have to adopt Ind AS for the Financial Statements from the Accounting Period beginning on or after 1st April 2016: Companies whose debt or equity are listed or are in the process of being listed on any stock exchange in India or Outside India “+” having net worth of Rs. 500 Crores or more. Companies which are not listed but are having Net Worth of Rs. 500 Crores or more. Holding, Joint Venture, Associates or Subsidiary Companies of the companies covered by above two clauses.
The High Court in a quo warranto proceeding should be slow to pronounce upon the matter unless there is a clear infringement of the law.
and hazards. Take a look at these statistics: Every four minutes, an Indian is killed in a road accident. Every year, chronic illnesses like cancer, heart disease, and respiratory ailments contribute to 60% of all deaths in India[2].
Hon’ble ITAT decided in this matter that reopening without application of mind is liable to quash and also elaborate that examination of facts and information received is necessary before reopening. In addition to this legal ground ITAT also heard the appeal on merits
ITAT Pune held In the case of M/s. D.J. Malpani vs. ACIT that in respect of the assessments which are completed prior to the date of search, no fresh claim of deduction can be made by the assessee. Therefore in the given case, assessee is not entitled to make a fresh claim in the return filed u/s.153A
ITAT Delhi held In the case of Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. vs. ADIT that the said issue is already covered in favour of the assessee by tribunal decision given in earlier years in which the tribunal held that the contracts are divisible.
