In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (15) of section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961(43 of 1961) read with Income-tax (Dispute Resolution Panel) Rules, 2009 as amended from time to time and in supersession of earlier Orders constituting Dispute Resolution Panels at Mumbai and Pune, the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby constitutes the Dispute Resolution Panels at Mumbai and Pune comprising of three Commissioners of Income-tax as Members of the said Panels with a Reserve Member in each Panel in accordance with Rule 3(3) of the Income-tax (Dispute Resolution Panel) Rules, 2009 as under:
Section 151 of the Companies Act,2013 and Rule 7 of the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules,2014 deals with the appointment of director elected by small shareholder.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (5) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act and in pursuance of rule 23 of the said rules, the Central Government hereby makes
Real estate investment trusts (REITs) has been one of the most important vehicles for making collective investment in commercial real estate. Emanating in the USA in 1960s as a tax transparent collective investment vehicle, REITs have subsequently been used by several other countries, and have done remarkably well. REITs provide a way of making a diversified investment in realty
As per the original provisions under the Special Economic Zones (SEZs) Act, 2005 and Rules, 2006, exemption from Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) in the case of SEZ Developers and Units as also the exemption from Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) for SEZ Developers were granted.
As per the records of the Centralized Processing Cell (TDS), it has been observed that the Accounts Office Identification Number (AIN) has not been mentioned in the TDS statements submitted by you. What is AIN and its relevance : AIN is a unique seven digit number allotted by NSDL, to the Pay and Accounts Office […]
The Delhi High Court has dismissed two writ petitions filed by N.Gopalaswami (Former CEC) & others and Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate challenging the appointment of Shri Shashi Kant Sharma as CAG of India made in May 2013
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 8B of the Customs Tariff Act, read with rules 12, 14 and 17 of the Customs Tariff (Identification and Assessment of Safeguard Duty) Rules, 1997, the Central Government after considering
