Income Tax : Explore recent Supreme Court rulings (2023) on income tax issues. Highlights of key cases, analysis, and implications....
Income Tax : Section 36 – Other Deductions Section 36 of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, provides a list of explicit deductions for computin...
Income Tax : The Delhi High Court, has held in CIT vs. Samara India(P) Ltd. (2013) 216 Taxman 93 , following the decision of Supreme Court in T...
Income Tax : In this discussion, we would take up Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and analyse the provision therein from all fa...
Income Tax : ection 55 (2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 provides the option to the assesse to consider the fair market value of capital asset...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT ruling favors G-Tekt India Pvt. Ltd., allowing deduction for CENVAT Credit written off. Detailed analysis of the case a...
Income Tax : In the case of Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. vs. DCIT, ITAT Chennai rejects AO's disallowance of stale drafts, citing precedent and bankin...
Income Tax : Expenditure incurred by assessee should be disallowed to the extent that expenditure which had been incurred for evaluation of bus...
Income Tax : In a recent decision, ITAT Delhi permits bad debts claimed under section 36(1)(vii) by Oriental Bank of Commerce, setting aside CI...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance made u/s. 14A of the Income Tax Act read with rule 8D deleted as tax free funds were more than ...
Delhi ITAT ruling favors G-Tekt India Pvt. Ltd., allowing deduction for CENVAT Credit written off. Detailed analysis of the case and implications.
In the case of Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. vs. DCIT, ITAT Chennai rejects AO’s disallowance of stale drafts, citing precedent and banking business nature.
Expenditure incurred by assessee should be disallowed to the extent that expenditure which had been incurred for evaluation of business opportunities that could not be said to be in line with the existing business or an extension of the existing business of assessee of manufacturing of paints and enamels.
In a recent decision, ITAT Delhi permits bad debts claimed under section 36(1)(vii) by Oriental Bank of Commerce, setting aside CIT(A)’s order.
ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance made u/s. 14A of the Income Tax Act read with rule 8D deleted as tax free funds were more than investment made on which exempt income was earned.
ITAT Mumbai held that non-examination of the details clearly makes the order of AO erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Accordingly, PCIT correctly assumed the revisional jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
TDS was not to be deducted on payments to Manthan Systems Inc. (MSI) for sales commission under section 40(a)(i) as services rendered to assessee by the said Manthan Systems Inc. was not falling within the ambit of FTS or under Article 12 of the treaty, assessee was not liable to deduct TDS on the payment made to the MSI.
ITAT Mumbai held that the ESOP expenses claimed by the assessee is an allowable expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that income by way of interest on loans given for residential purposes for period less than 5 years is eligible for deduction under section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act.
Explore recent Supreme Court rulings (2023) on income tax issues. Highlights of key cases, analysis, and implications.
