Income Tax : Section 271AAB penalties will not apply to searches initiated under Section 132 after September 1, 2024, as per the Finance Bill, ...
Income Tax : Penalty under Section 271AAB of the Income-tax Act is not applicable for searches after 1st September 2024, replaced by Section 15...
Income Tax : Discover penalties and prosecutions under the Income Tax Act, 1961, including default conditions, quantum of penalties, and potent...
Income Tax : A detailed guide on updated penalties under the Income Tax Act, 1961 for AY 2025-26. Learn about fines for non-compliance, under-r...
Income Tax : Explore the implications of taxation under section 115BBE, including misuse of sections 68 to 69D, consequences of high tax rates,...
Income Tax : Section 271AAB provides for imposition of penalty at specified rates where search has been initiated. The rate of penalty varies...
Income Tax : Section 271AAB provides for imposition of penalty @ 10% on undisclosed income found during the course of search and admitted at t...
Income Tax : Present scheme of administration of Search and Assessment of search cases needs to be made effective to reduce technical complexit...
Income Tax : ITAT Nagpur held that addition towards unexplained expenditure u/s. 69C of the Income Tax Act not warranted since the same are alr...
Income Tax : ITAT Jaipur held that addition towards undisclosed income rightly sustained since assessee failed to explain the incriminating mat...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai ruled on Dev Engineers Vs DCIT, deleting penalties under Sections 271(1)(c) and 271AAB. Additions were based on estima...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that section 275(1A) of the Income Tax Act empowers AO to pass penalty order by enhancing or reducing penalty ...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune held that penalty under section 271(1)(c)/ 271AAB of the Income Tax Act imposable even in case of voluntary disclosure o...
Smt. Priyanka Agarwal Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur) Taking into facts and circumstances of the case it is an evident from the show cause notice u/s 274 read with section 271AAB of the Act that the Assessing Officer was not clear i.e whether it is for the clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c) of […]
ACIT Vs Amit Tiwari (ITAT Indore) The submissions of the assessee are that penalty proceedings u/s 271AAB as initiated is bad in law on account of firstly penalty notice so issued is defective as it does not disclose specific charge and secondly there is no concealed income as search took place prior to due date […]
ITAT Kolkata held that penalty u/s 271AAB of the Income Tax Act cannot be levied on the assessee based on the disclosure made by other person during the course of search proceedings.
A perusal of Section 271AAB would reveal that it is applicable where search has been initiated under section 132 of Income Tax Act
Jagdishbhai R. Patel Vs ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) CIT(A) upheld the penalty of Rs.19,50,000/-,levied u/s 271AAB of the Act @ 30% of the undisclosed income of Rs.65 lacs, noting that the assessee had failed to fulfill the following conditions by the specified date as required by the section : a) filing its return declaring the undisclosed […]
Explore Mahaveer Prasad Agarwal vs. DCIT case at ITAT Jaipur, analyzing discretionary penalties under sections 271AAB and 271 of the Income Tax Act.
Explore the ITAT Mumbai decision in Ramavatar Mandavewala vs. JT.CIT regarding the applicability of penalty under Section 271AAB for undisclosed cash. Detailed analysis and conclusion.
Under the Income-tax Act, penalties are levied for various defaults committed by the taxpayer. Some of the penalties are mandatory and a few are at the discretion of the tax authorities. In this part, you can gain knowledge about the provisions relating to various penalties leviable under the Income-tax Act.
It is proposed to amend the sections 271AAB, 271AAC and 271AAD by enabling the Commissioner (Appeals) to levy penalty under these sections to the along with Assessing Officer.
Shri D.S. Patil Vs PCIT (ITAT Banglore) Penalty u/ s. 271AAB can be levied in the hands of a searched person only. The assessee herein is not subjected to search, meaning thereby, penalty u/s. 271AAB cannot be levied in the hands of the assessee. Even though, the AO has not cited any reason for dropping […]
