Income Tax : Discover the risks and penalties of submitting fake rent receipts to claim HRA exemptions and learn how to comply with tax regulat...
Income Tax : Discover penalties and prosecutions under the Income Tax Act, 1961, including default conditions, quantum of penalties, and potent...
Income Tax : All about interest under sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D of the Income Tax Act, including when it is charged, rates, and calcu...
Income Tax : Missed the ITR filing deadline? Learn the penalties, interest charges, and restrictions. Understand the consequences and how to fi...
CA, CS, CMA : Discover the complexities of tax compliance for freelancers and gig workers, from understanding income sources to navigating legal...
Income Tax : All Odisha Tax Advocates Association has filed an PIl before Orissa High Court with following Prayers- (i) Admit the Writ Petition...
Income Tax : Representation for relaxation from levy of interest u/s. 234A on payment of self-assessment tax for A.Y. 2020-21 within extended d...
Income Tax : The Government is planning to specify a certain category of taxpayers to pay their entire tax liability for FY 2019-20 in advanc...
Income Tax : At the end of May the Income Tax Return forms are released for the Assessment Year 2015-16 and same been held back by finance mini...
Income Tax : Delhi HC orders re-assessment of Seema Tripathi's DTVSV application after rejecting cancellation by PCIT, citing judicial preceden...
Income Tax : In the present case, recovery or repayment of fraudulent income does not qualify as an allowable expense. Allowing deductions for ...
Income Tax : ITAT Jaipur ruling on Parshavnath Buildestate Pvt Ltd vs ACIT regarding unexplained expenditures under Section 69C and taxation un...
Income Tax : Claim of the assessee for deduction for education cess was on a bonafide belief that it was allowable expenditure u/s. 37(1) and h...
Income Tax : In the recent ruling HC of Telangana have held that assessee is eligible to claim capital gain after observing that the possession...
Income Tax : The due date of furnishing of Return of Income for the Assessment Year 2021-22, which is 31st July 2021 under sub-section (1) of s...
Income Tax : CIRCULAR NO. 2/2015 The Board has decided that no interest under section 234A of the Act is chargeable on the amount of self-asses...
Delhi HC orders re-assessment of Seema Tripathi’s DTVSV application after rejecting cancellation by PCIT, citing judicial precedents for interest waiver.
In the present case, recovery or repayment of fraudulent income does not qualify as an allowable expense. Allowing deductions for recovery of fraudulent income would contradict the legislative intent of the Income-tax Act.
ITAT Jaipur ruling on Parshavnath Buildestate Pvt Ltd vs ACIT regarding unexplained expenditures under Section 69C and taxation under Section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act.
Claim of the assessee for deduction for education cess was on a bonafide belief that it was allowable expenditure u/s. 37(1) and hence, the same was not a case for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s. 270A.
In the recent ruling HC of Telangana have held that assessee is eligible to claim capital gain after observing that the possession of the immovable property has not been handed over to the developer as contemplated u/s 53A of the Transfer of the Property Act, 1882.
ITAT Delhi held that advertisement and distribution revenue earned by Discovery Asia Inc. is taxable as per Mutual Agreement Resolution (MAP) as decided by competent authority of India & USA. Accordingly, appeal allowed partially.
ITAT Ahmedabad affirms CIT(A)’s deletion of ₹12.92 crore tax addition under Section 40A(3), relying on past gross profit rates and valid agricultural purchases.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that services do not qualify as Fee for Technical Services [FTS] under India-Netherlands tax treaty since department failed to demonstrate that technology was ‘make available’ to recipient of services.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition towards unexplained cash deposits not justified as CIT(A) has partly accepted the cash book and partly rejected the cash book without assigning any reason. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
ITAT Ahmedabad allows Pankajkumar Patel’s appeal for statistical purposes, remanding unexplained investment case to AO for reconsideration under Section 69A.
