Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that an addition under Section 69A cannot be sustained when the assessee is denied the opportunity to cross-exami...
Income Tax : ITAT held that additions based solely on third-party search material without independent evidence or cross-examination are invalid...
Income Tax : ITAT held that a return filed under section 148 remains valid even if delayed. Failure to issue mandatory notice under section 143...
Income Tax : Judicial rulings clarify that satisfaction for initiating action against other persons in search cases must be recorded promptly. ...
Income Tax : The Finance Bill 2026 proposes allowing taxpayers to file an Updated Return even after receiving a reassessment notice under Secti...
Income Tax : Learn about the new block assessment provisions for cases involving searches under section 132 and requisitions under section 132A...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Humble Representation for modification of Section 151 of the Income Tax Act relating to Sanction for issue of Notice under sec. 14...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : ITAT Indore held that appellate order violated principles of natural justice after finding that key hearing notices were sent to a...
Income Tax : Court ruled that reassessment notices under Section 148 must be issued through the faceless mechanism under Section 151A and the 2...
Income Tax : The Madras High Court held that reassessment notices required to be issued by the Faceless Assessing Officer are invalid if issued...
Income Tax : The Madras High Court held that reassessment notices required to be issued by the Faceless Assessing Officer are invalid if issued...
Income Tax : The Jharkhand High Court held that retrospective insertion of Section 147A removed the jurisdictional challenge against reassessme...
Income Tax : The department has identified high-risk cases through its Insight Portal for AYs 2022-25. It directs officers to initiate reassess...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Explore the latest guidelines for issuing notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Understand key procedures, amendme...
Income Tax : Explore e-Verification Instruction No. 2 of 2024 from the Directorate of Income Tax (Systems). Detailed guidelines for AOs under I...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
ITAT Jaipur rules reassessment notice issued post-TOLA limit invalid in Sanskriti Build-Dev vs ITO. Proceedings declared time-barred under Rajeev Bansal ruling.
ITAT Jaipur deletes ₹6.26 Cr. addition u/s 68, stating it would be double taxation. Tribunal also rules that the CIT(A) exceeded jurisdiction by remanding the case for verification of already submitted documents.
ITAT Chennai invalidates reassessment under Section 148 as notice issued by Jurisdictional AO post 29.03.2022 violated faceless procedure.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai has invalidated the reassessment against Sunidhi Securities & Finance Limited, citing an incorrect sanctioning authority for the Section 148 notice. The case centered on a reassessment initiated for alleged bogus trading losses, which the Tribunal deemed null and void based on the judicial precedent set by the Supreme Court.
The Rajasthan High Court, citing prior judgments, invalidated a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act because it was issued by a Jurisdictional Assessing Officer instead of the designated Faceless Assessing Officer.
ITAT Delhi rules a reassessment void, holding that the Section 148 notice was issued beyond the statutory limitation period, citing Supreme Court and High Court precedents.
ITAT Delhi deletes a Rs.3.60 crore addition to income, ruling that unrealized interest cannot be taxed and that a fraudulent TDS return does not constitute actual income.
ITAT Delhi partly allows assessee’s appeal, holding Rs.70.46 lakh addition for Kolkata property wrongly made in wife’s hands; entire investment made and disclosed by husband.
Pune ITAT deletes disallowance of cash-based remuneration to partners and salaries to employees, finding no legal bar or evidence of inflated expenses.
The Rajasthan High Court in Krishan Gopal Gupta vs PCIT has ruled that a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act is invalid if issued by a Jurisdictional Assessing Officer, reaffirming its earlier judgments on the matter.
