Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manoj Kumar Sahu Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Manoj Kumar Sahu Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur) In this appeal before Raipur Bench , Assessee challenged reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 147 for AY 2013-14. The first legal ground raised was that notice u/s 148 was invalid as prior approval u/s 151 had not been obtained. Tribunal rejected this contention, recording that approval was duly obtained on 17.02.2020 & notice u/s 148 was issued only thereafter on 20.02.2020. Hence this ground was dismissed. The second ground, alleging invalidity of approval because the physical copy did not bear a date, was not pressed by the Assessee & accordin...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930