Ravray Construction & Anr. Vs Add. Commissioner (Gujarat High Court)
The Gujarat High Court quashed and set aside the show cause notice dated 23.10.2021, order-in-original dated 7.2.2022 and appellate orders passed against Ravray Construction & Anr. The petitioners, engaged in construction, renovation or alteration of public roads, had provided services valued at Rs.4,46,66,920/- during FY 2016-17 to M/s JRA Infrastructure Limited and M/s PM Construction. The respondent authorities had sought to recover Service Tax of Rs.67,00,038/- with interest and penalty by invoking the extended period under section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. The petitioners contended that the services were exempt under Notification No.25/2012-ST dated 20.6.2012 and that mandatory pre-consultation had not been undertaken before issuance of the SCN. Relying upon its earlier decision in M/s Jay Mahakali Industrial Service and the legal position considered in L AND T Hydrocarbon Engineering Ltd., the High Court held that the issue was no longer res integra. It concluded that the impugned proceedings could not be sustained in the absence of the required pre-consultation. The authorities were, however, permitted to take appropriate proceedings if permissible within limitation after giving pre-consultation notice.
Cases Discussed
- Dharamshil Agencies Vs Union of India — 2021 (55) G.S.T.L. 516 (Guj.).
- M/s Jay Mahakali Industrial Service Vs Union of India and others — Special Civil Application No.18864 of 2021 and allied matters, order dated 9.1.2025.
- L AND T Hydrocarbon Engineering Ltd. Vs Union of India — 2022 (4) TMI 70.
- Amadeus India Pvt Ltd Vs. Principal Commissioner — 2019-TIOL-1027-HC-DEL-ST.
- Tube Investment of India Ltd. Vs. Union of India — 2018-TIOL-330-HC-MAD-CX.
- Panoli Intermediate (India) Ltd Vs UOI — 2015 (326) ELT 532 (Guj.), as relied upon by the petitioners and distinguished by the respondents.
FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF GUJARAT




