Income Tax : Appeal against penalty under Section 271(1)(b) citing ill health, lack of awareness of Faceless Scheme, and procedural lapses. Req...
Income Tax : Budget 2025 revises block assessment rules for search cases, covering undisclosed income, assessment procedures, penalties, and ti...
Income Tax : Explore key court rulings on reassessment under Section 148 post-2021 amendments, covering procedural changes, taxpayer rights, an...
Income Tax : Union Budget 2025-26 introduces tax reforms, revised income tax slabs, increased rebate under Section 87A, and changes in TDS/TCS ...
Income Tax : Explore the Bombay High Court's decision on reassessment under Section 147, balancing tax authority powers with procedural safegua...
Income Tax : Learn about the new block assessment provisions for cases involving searches under section 132 and requisitions under section 132A...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Humble Representation for modification of Section 151 of the Income Tax Act relating to Sanction for issue of Notice under sec. 14...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : The case of the assessee was selected for complete scrutiny assessment and notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was issue...
Income Tax : Patna High Court upholds Section 148 notice to Abha Saraf, ruling it was issued within extended limitation due to Supreme Court's ...
Income Tax : Patna High Court upholds Section 148 notice to Venky Steels Pvt. Ltd., ruling approval process met legal requirements under Sectio...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court held that once addition on the basis of which reasons recorded for reopening of assessment under section 147 of t...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur held that due to non-response for assessee if addition of income is done as Form 26AS then obviously TDS credit availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Explore the latest guidelines for issuing notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Understand key procedures, amendme...
Income Tax : Explore e-Verification Instruction No. 2 of 2024 from the Directorate of Income Tax (Systems). Detailed guidelines for AOs under I...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
Corporate Law : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association (W.B.) Unit Date: 02.02.2023. To The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, W...
The case of the assessee was selected for complete scrutiny assessment and notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was issued. Consequently, notice u/s 142(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were also issued.
Patna High Court upholds Section 148 notice to Abha Saraf, ruling it was issued within extended limitation due to Supreme Court’s COVID-related order.
Patna High Court upholds Section 148 notice to Venky Steels Pvt. Ltd., ruling approval process met legal requirements under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act.
Delhi High Court held that once addition on the basis of which reasons recorded for reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act has been deleted, then, other addition made are not sustainable in law. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
ITAT Raipur held that due to non-response for assessee if addition of income is done as Form 26AS then obviously TDS credit available in Form 26AS needs also to be allowed. Thus, appeal partly allowed.
ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the assessment as framed by Assessing Officer International Taxation is bad-in-law.
ITAT Raipur held that passing of order by CIT(A) without considering adjournment request of the assessee is not justifiable in law. Accordingly, matter restored back to CIT(A) to re-adjudicate the same after affording reasonable opportunity of being heard.
ITAT Pune condones delay, remands Sujit Taware’s assessment to AO for fresh adjudication on cash deposit and property purchase.
ITAT Pune deletes capital gains addition u/s 2(47) as possession wasn’t transferred under development agreement.
ITAT Raipur held that addition towards cash deposited during demonization period partly set aside based on CBDT Instruction No. 03/2017 dated 21.02.2017. Accordingly, appeal of assessee partly allowed.
