Corporate Law : Explore the impact of builder insolvency on homebuyers in India and the challenges within the insolvency resolution process. Learn...
Corporate Law : FedEx's appeal for CIRP against Zipker was dismissed by NCLT, ruling the company's name must be restored under specific provisions...
Corporate Law : Explore recent Supreme Court rulings on dissenting creditor rights and set-off claims in insolvency cases. Detailed analysis of ke...
Corporate Law : Explore significant legal developments, Supreme Court verdicts, and detailed analyses in the Q4 2023 newsletter. Stay informed on ...
Corporate Law : Explore the vital role of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) in protecting employee rights during corporate insolvency, high...
Company Law : The Government defines the 30-day time limit for filing representations before NCLAT under the Companies Act, with no cases pendin...
Company Law : Government response on political appointments in NCLT/NCLAT and reasons behind delays in IBC case disposal....
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Company Law : Explore the current status of pending cases in NCLT and NCLAT as of August 2024, reasons for delays, and the government's strategi...
Corporate Law : Join the discussion on MCA's proposed changes to Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code rules. Learn how to participate and share your ins...
Corporate Law : RP could not be blamed for having breached the IBC for the CoC to have approved the resolution plan of Parth with requisite majori...
Corporate Law : This is an Appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against the dismissal of the Company Petition by wh...
Company Law : NCLAT Delhi held that even if the secured creditor proceeds to realise its security interest it is liable to pay liquidator fee as...
Company Law : NCLT Delhi held that admissible of application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) not justified sin...
Corporate Law : Aggrieved by the impugned order, the present appeal had been filed by the shareholder of the Corporate Debtor. The Corporate Debt...
Corporate Law : IBBI orders disciplinary action against Mr. S Vasudevan for alleged violations in the insolvency process of Mega Foods Products Ma...
Corporate Law : IBBI suspends IP for Failure to act during CIRP despite NCLAT directive and for Delay in convening Committee of Creditors (CoC) me...
Corporate Law : Read about the IBBI's disciplinary action against Mr. Venkata Sivakumar, an Interim Resolution Professional, for sharing asset mem...
Corporate Law : Govt issued a circular detailing vacancies for Judicial & Technical Members posts in NCLAT with detailed guide to apply for these...
Fema / RBI : It is clarified that cases admitted with National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)/National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) unde...
RP could not be blamed for having breached the IBC for the CoC to have approved the resolution plan of Parth with requisite majority share which action was taken by the CoC in the exercise of its commercial wisdom.
This is an Appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against the dismissal of the Company Petition by which the Adjudicating Authority has dismissed the Section 7 Petition.
NCLAT Delhi held that even if the secured creditor proceeds to realise its security interest it is liable to pay liquidator fee as contemplated under Regulation 21A (2)(a) of the Liquidation Regulations, 2016.
NCLT Delhi held that admissible of application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) not justified since invoices covered under section 10A has to be excluded and accordingly amount claimed will be less than threshold limit of Rs. 1 Crore.
Aggrieved by the impugned order, the present appeal had been filed by the shareholder of the Corporate Debtor. The Corporate Debtor entered into Service Agreement with Sigma Supply Chain Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
NCLAT Delhi held that issuer raising amount by issuance of convertible debenture is clearly a ‘financial debt’ within the meaning of section 5(8) of the IBC. Accordingly, appeal dismissed.
The Liquidator published Sale Notice for reserve price on 12.08.2021 fixing sale price of 6.50. No bids came hence another e-Auction Notice was issued. The Appellant submitted its e-bid in pursuance of Sale Notice 12.09.2021.
NCLAT Delhi held that liquidator cannot create sub-lease over properties not owned by the corporate debtor without prior permission of concerned authority. Accordingly, action to sub-lease without specific permission is incorrect and illegal.
NCLAT Delhi held that date of declaration of the loan account/ debt as NPA can be reckoned as the date of default to enable the Financial Creditor to initiate action under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
The IRP sent a report in which two more unsecured financial creditors, the appellants herein, were included in the CoC on the ground that they had given personal guarantee to the applicant bank for securing the loan advanced to the corporate debtor.
