Corporate Law : Explore the impact of builder insolvency on homebuyers in India and the challenges within the insolvency resolution process. Learn...
Corporate Law : FedEx's appeal for CIRP against Zipker was dismissed by NCLT, ruling the company's name must be restored under specific provisions...
Corporate Law : Explore recent Supreme Court rulings on dissenting creditor rights and set-off claims in insolvency cases. Detailed analysis of ke...
Corporate Law : Explore significant legal developments, Supreme Court verdicts, and detailed analyses in the Q4 2023 newsletter. Stay informed on ...
Corporate Law : Explore the vital role of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) in protecting employee rights during corporate insolvency, high...
Corporate Law : NCLT & NCLAT eligibility criteria, insolvency rules, and case statistics from 2022-2024. Updates on financial irregularities and r...
Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...
Company Law : The Government defines the 30-day time limit for filing representations before NCLAT under the Companies Act, with no cases pendin...
Company Law : Government response on political appointments in NCLT/NCLAT and reasons behind delays in IBC case disposal....
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Corporate Law : NCLAT Delhi held that in absence of both disbursements directly to Corporate Debtor and default, attempt to invoke proceedings u/s...
Corporate Law : NCLAT Delhi held that demand notice issued u/s. 95(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [IBC] when sent to last known ad...
Corporate Law : NCLAT rules allottee who cancelled unit by request cannot be financial creditor. Order directs payment of settled bank loan....
Company Law : NCLAT Delhi held that failure of reconciliation of accounts qualifies as pre-existing dispute. Thus, order admitting application u...
Company Law : NCLAT Delhi allows the appeal of Essar Oil & Gas, setting aside the NCLT Ahmedabad order admitting Section 9 application filed by ...
Corporate Law : IBBI orders disciplinary action against Mr. S Vasudevan for alleged violations in the insolvency process of Mega Foods Products Ma...
Corporate Law : IBBI suspends IP for Failure to act during CIRP despite NCLAT directive and for Delay in convening Committee of Creditors (CoC) me...
Corporate Law : Read about the IBBI's disciplinary action against Mr. Venkata Sivakumar, an Interim Resolution Professional, for sharing asset mem...
Corporate Law : Govt issued a circular detailing vacancies for Judicial & Technical Members posts in NCLAT with detailed guide to apply for these...
Fema / RBI : It is clarified that cases admitted with National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)/National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) unde...
NCLAT Delhi held that in absence of both disbursements directly to Corporate Debtor and default, attempt to invoke proceedings u/s. 7 of IBC unsustainable. Thus, since CIRP was fraudulent and malicious, dismissal u/s. 65 of IBC upheld.
NCLAT Delhi held that demand notice issued u/s. 95(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [IBC] when sent to last known address as stipulated in Guarantee Deed is valid service of notice under established legal principles. Accordingly, appeals dismissed.
NCLAT rules allottee who cancelled unit by request cannot be financial creditor. Order directs payment of settled bank loan.
NCLAT Delhi held that failure of reconciliation of accounts qualifies as pre-existing dispute. Thus, order admitting application u/s. 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ignoring pre-existing dispute is not justified. Hence, order is set aside.
NCLAT Delhi allows the appeal of Essar Oil & Gas, setting aside the NCLT Ahmedabad order admitting Section 9 application filed by Greeka Greens Solution.
On an application filed u/s. 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the Corporate Debtor – Lavasa Corporation Limited was admitted to insolvency resolution process by order dated 30.08.2018.
NCLAT Delhi held that post approval of resolution plan both by CoC and the adjudicating authority, it cannot be reopened on the basis of claims being belatedly agitated by the appellant. Thus, admission of claim rightly rejected by adjudicating authority.
NCLAT Delhi held that beneficiary under the personal guarantee is fully entitled to initiate Personal Insolvency Resolution Process against personal guarantor u/s. 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC).
Supreme Court addresses IBC appeal delay; Power Infrastructure India vs. Power Finance Corp. NCLAT’s strict timeline adherence questioned.
NCLAT Delhi held that issuance of notice under rule 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority for Insolvency Resolution Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors) Rules, 2019 doesn’t amount to invoking of guarantee.
