Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : Discover the adjudication order under Section 203(1) of the Companies Act, 2013. Standard Glass Lining Technology Ltd. penalized f...
Company Law : Learn about MCA's penalty for failure to report violations in audit reports under Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013. Detailed...
Company Law : MCA penalizes Harjinder Kaur Chawdhary ₹2.92 lakh for violating Section 155 of the Companies Act, 2013 by obtaining two Director...
Company Law : MCA imposes a penalty on T. Forrest & Sons India Pvt Ltd for delaying the issuance of share certificates, violating Section 56(4) ...
Company Law : Explore the implications of MCA penalizing TDMAX Manufacturing & Services Pvt Ltd for not regularizing an additional director unde...
Understand the penalties under Section 90(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 for filing delays of BEN-2 forms. Detailed analysis of Deer Smart India Pvt Ltd’s case.
Banaras Beads Ltd fined ₹6 lakh for delayed BEN-2 filing. Learn about the adjudication process, legal implications, and compliance requirements under Section 90(4).
Read the adjudication order by RoC Maharashtra penalizing SAPTASATIJ METATECH PRIVATE LIMITED under Companies Act, 2013, Section 92. Detailed analysis and implications.
Read MCA’s adjudication order penalizing Saptasatij Metatech Pvt Ltd ₹25,000 for non-paginated minute books under Companies Act, 2013. Full analysis and implications.
Read about SAPTASATIJ METATECH PRIVATE LIMITED’s penalty of ₹8 lakh under Section 454(3) r/w Section 134 of the Companies Act, 2013 by MCA for inadequate maintenance of auditing records.
MCA imposes a ₹4.5 lakh penalty on Saptasatij Metatech Pvt Ltd for not maintaining a Register of Members as per Section 88 of Companies Act, 2013.
The MCA has penalized Richesm Healthcare Limited for making private placement offers without closing previous ones. Learn more about the violation and penalties imposed.
Learn about MCAs penalty on JKJM Infrastructure Private Limited for non-compliance with Companies Act 2013 regarding capital increase. Details, analysis, and implications.
Explore the detailed analysis of MCA’s penalty imposition on JKJM Infrastructure Private Limited for violating Companies Act, 2013. Understand the implications and adjudication rules.
Adjudication order for Hadapsar Urban Multiple Nidhi Ltd under Section 454(3) read with 39 of The Companies Act, 2013. Detailed analysis and penalties imposed.
