Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Arshiya Rail Infrastructure Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Arshiya Rail Infrastructure Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai) CESTAT Mumbai held that refund claim under section 11B filed beyond the period of one year from the relevant date is not maintainable. Here, relevant date was date on which appellant has voluntarily paid the short payment of service tax. Facts- The appellants are engaged in the activity of providing services under the category of ‘Cargo Handling Service’ etc. to their clients. The appellants are also holding Category-I license as Container Train Operator and are running container traffic acr...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930