Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Arshiya Rail Infrastructure Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Arshiya Rail Infrastructure Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)

CESTAT Mumbai held that refund claim under section 11B filed beyond the period of one year from the relevant date is not maintainable. Here, relevant date was date on which appellant has voluntarily paid the short payment of service tax.

Facts- The appellants are engaged in the activity of providing services under the category of ‘Cargo Handling Service’ etc. to their cl

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930