Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re V.S. Trading Company (GST AAR Tamilnadu)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re V.S. Trading Company (GST AAR Tamilnadu)

The Tamil Nadu Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) rejected V.S. Trading Company’s application for rectification of an earlier ruling concerning the GST classification of tapioca flour. The company had argued that the AAR incorrectly classified their product under HSN 2303.10 (“Residues of starch manufacture”) at a 5% tax rate, instead of HSN 1106 (flour of sago or roots/tubers) which they claimed should be exempt. The company asserted that the AAR misunderstood the tapioca flour production process, stating it’s

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930