Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Cable Vision Vs Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Cable Vision Vs Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax (CESTAT Chennai) CESTAT Chennai held that penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 not imposable in absence of deliberate intention to evade the payment of service tax. Facts- It is the case of the assessee that it had claimed input service tax credit to the extent of Rs. 34,31,074/-, however, the same was restricted to Rs. 4,56,032/-. It is contended that the Adjudicating Authority was correct in denying the CENVAT Credit for the reason that some of the invoices were without signature and that in certain cases, conditions...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031