Case Law Details
Sanjay Baweja Vs DCIT (Delhi High Court)
In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court provided clarity on the tax treatment of one-time voluntary payments made in lieu of Employee Stock Option Plans (ESOPs). The case, titled Sanjay Baweja Vs DCIT, involved an ex-employee of Flipkart Internet Private Limited (FIPL) challenging the tax authority’s decision to treat a compensation payment from the employer’s foreign parent company as a part of his salary under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Background:
Sanjay Baweja, the petitioner, was an employee of Flipkart Internet Private Limited (FIPL), a subsidiary of Flipkart Marketplace Private Limited (FMPL), which, in turn, was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Flipkart Pvt. Ltd., Singapore (FPS). As part of his employment package, Sanjay Baweja was granted stock options under the Flipkart Stock Option Plan (FSOP) by FPS.
In a significant development, FPS announced its decision to divest its wholly-owned subsidiary, PhonePe. This announcement led to a decline in the value of the stock options granted under FSOP, causing concern among option holders like Sanjay Baweja. Responding to this situation, FPS took the initiative to offer a one-time compensation payment to all option holders to mitigate the loss incurred due to the reduced value of their options.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
I also wanted to understand.
Has anyone able to conclude under which section we can report the earning paid out.
please share
Hi Team,
Thank you for this article. I have similar situation where I am am ex employee of Flipkart. I received voluntary payment from Flipkart in lieu of shares vested to me.
TDS of 30% was applied to the payout.
Flipkart has not provided any Form 16 for the payment made.
I wanted to understand how do I claim refund for the tax deducted.
Hi Sandeep,
What is the taxability of this receipt in view of section 56(2)(xi) of IT Act, 1961. This clause was inserted in 2018 budget.