Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Arun Keshavrao Narwade (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2005-06
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Arun Keshavrao Narwade (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)

The assessee claimed that he purchased a residential house on 04-10-2004 for a sum of Rs.16,03,820/- and thus claimed exemption in the computation of income filed by him in response to notice u/s. 148. This claim was jettisoned by the AO on the ground that the assessee did not purchase a new residential flat but only an “office premises” and hence, section 54F could not apply. It is apparent from bare reading of section 54F that the exemption becomes available towards capital gain arising from the tran

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930