Case Law Details
Manesh Dayashankar Madeka Vs ACIT Circle 1(1) & Anr. (Supreme Court of India)
Introduction: In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court of India has granted leave in the case of Manesh Dayashankar Madeka Vs ACIT Circle 1(1) & Anr. The writ petition, challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) order, faced an unexpected twist as it was not entertained by the High Court due to the retirement of the Presiding Judge.
Detailed Analysis: The petitioner sought various reliefs, including quashing notices under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and challenging the order disposing of objections along with show-cause notices for specific assessment years. However, the High Court, on 27.9.2021, did not entertain the petition, and no reasons were provided at that time. Notably, the Presiding Judge of the Division Bench had retired.
The Supreme Court, upon hearing the senior counsel for both parties, set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the High Court. The writ petition is to be reheard, and a new order, supported by reasons, is to be passed in accordance with the law. The Court emphasized the need for a fresh hearing due to the retirement of the Presiding Judge and the lack of reasons in the previous disposition.
Conclusion: In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s decision to direct the rehearing of the writ petition underscores the importance of a fair and thorough consideration of legal matters. The impact of the retirement of the Presiding Judge on the initial non-entertainment of the petition raises questions about procedural fairness. As the case returns to the High Court, it opens a new chapter in the legal proceedings, highlighting the complexities and nuances of the judicial process in tax matters. The legal community awaits the outcome of the rehearing and the issuance of a fresh order supported by comprehensive reasons.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
