Revised return not become invalid merely for filing after issue of Notice U/s. 143(2)

Shri Mahesh H. Hinduja Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai) As could be seen from the facts on record, in the original return of income the assessee had neither declared the long term capital gain nor has claimed deduction under section 54 of the Act. Further, the rental income offered in the original return of income was lesser than the amount actually received by the assessee. Therefore, on 20th October 2012, the assessee filed a revised return of income within the time prescribed under section 139(5) of the Act offering rental income of Rs. 6,24,050. Further, the assessee also declared net long term capi...