Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. Chhattisgarh Urology Society (Chhattisgarh High Court)
Indisputably, the respondent has moved the application before the expiry of one year from the date of its creation. In course of processing of the application, the trust was noticed to submit the books of accounts for FY 2013-14. While rejecting the application, the CIT has opined that the trust having failed to produce the books of accounts and further that the charitable activity is for promoting the Urologist so that more and more patients visit these Urologists, therefore, the society is basically in the nature of club of Urologist Doctors for the mutual benefit of Doctors who are its members, it is not entitled for registration.
The provision contained under Section 12A nowhere empowers the CIT to assess the objects vis-a-vis the books of accounts. Even otherwise, it is not to be seen at this stage as to whether the fulfillment of the charitable trust would eventually benefit the members of the society. If the constituent of the trust engage in some genuine charitable activity which may benefit them in some other aspect of their personality which may include their vocation in life, it would not affect the genuineness of the objects of the trust. A person does not engage in charity for not doing anything in the other walks of life. A charity for one particular object is not for destroying the career for an individual which he is otherwise entitled to profess. If this ground is considered to be affecting the genuineness of the trust, people successful in different walks of life would never engage in charitable activity.
