Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : D.C.I.T Vs. M/s. Pennzoil Quaker State India Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

D.C.I.T Vs. M/s. Pennzoil Quaker State India Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)

On a perusal of the notice issued u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act for initiation of proceedings we find that the Assessing Officer did not strike off and specify the charge/limb for which he is proposing to initiate penalty proceedings. However, in the Assessment Order, Assessing Officer records that the penalty proceedings are initiated for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.

Action of the Assessing Officer

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930