Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rajesh C. Sanghani Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Rajesh C. Sanghani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

Undisputedly, the basis for imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) is, the assessee has wrongly claimed deduction under section 54F. As could be seen, it is the claim of the assessee that capital gain arising from sale of shop is not taxable as the assessee has invested in flats No. 103 and 104, in the first floor of a building at Ghatkopar. The department also does not dispute this fact. Only ground on which the assessees claim of deduction 54F was disallow

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930