Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rajesh C. Sanghani Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rajesh C. Sanghani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Undisputedly, the basis for imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) is, the assessee has wrongly claimed deduction under section 54F. As could be seen, it is the claim of the assessee that capital gain arising from sale of shop is not taxable as the assessee has invested in flats No. 103 and 104, in the first floor of a building at Ghatkopar. The department also does not dispute this fact. Only ground on which the assessees claim of deduction 54F was disallowed was flats Nos. 103 and 104 are two separate properties. It is the claim of the assessee ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930