Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Subhankar Chakraborty Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Subhankar Chakraborty Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

Assessee filed ROI claiming relief u/s 90 but did not file Form No.67. Form was subsequently filed beyond the due date as per under Rule. CPC did not give credit for foreign tax. On appeal, CIT(A) held that as per Rules 128(8) and 128(9), relief u/s 90 cannot be allowed to the assessee as Form No.67 was filed beyond the due date as prescribed under Rule and dismissed the appeal

On further appeal before the ITAT, assessee submitted that filing o

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Gujarat HC Imposes Cost for High-Pitched Assessment Order Contrary to facts Tax on Gift from Step-brother/sister under Section 56: ITAT Mumbai Ruling Section 68 Applicable Only to Credits in Books in Relevant Year: Pune ITAT Only Profit Element Taxable in Commodity Transactions: ITAT Mumbai Amendment to Tolerance Limit Under Section 50C/56(2)(x) is Curative: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930