Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Annam Rajasekher Bindu Vs ITO (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No.13579 of 2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/01/2024
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Annam Rajasekher Bindu Vs ITO (Madras High Court)

The petitioner, Annam Rajasekher Bindu, challenged an order dated March 28, 2023, issued under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the consequential notice under Section 148 issued on the same date. The petitioner initially received a notice on February 28, 2023, under Section 148A(b), requesting a show cause as to why a notice under Section 148 should not be issued concerning specified transactions. The petitioner responded to this notice on March 3, 2023. Despite the response, the impugned order concluded that it was a fit case for the issuance of a notice under Section 148, leading to the filing of this writ petition.

Petitioner’s Arguments

The petitioner’s counsel contested the impugned order on three primary grounds:

    Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031