Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chellappan Sankaranathan Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chellappan Sankaranathan Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) ITAT Chennai Strikes Down JAO Issued 148 Notice- Only Faceless Unit Has Jurisdiction Post-2022 Chennai ITAT has quashed a reassessment proceeding, holding that a notice issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of the Faceless Assessment Unit was without jurisdiction & therefore invalid. Assessee was issued a notice u/s 148 dated 27.03.2023 by the ITO, International Taxation, Madurai. He objected to the validity of the reassessment on the ground that, by virtue of the CBDT Notification dt 29.03.2022 introducing the e-Assess...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930