Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT lifts attachment u/s 226(3) from Bank & debtors of COVID quarantine facilities constructor

Case Law Details

Case Name
Pandhes Infracon Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2010-11
Advertisement
Pandhes Infracon Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Mumbai ITAT worked from home and lifted attachment u/s 226(3) from Bank and debtors of COVID quarantine facilities constructor 1. The taxpayer sought an urgent hearing in respect of the recovery of the Income-tax demand of Rs. 2.91 Crores for the Assessment Year 2010-11. The total income tax demand was Rs. 6.47 crores out of which taxpayer already paid Rs. 3.56 Crores whereas tax component in total demand was Rs. 3.48 Crores. 2. The taxpayer sought for relief from garnishee proceedings. 3. The assessee taxpayer is a private limited company and a c...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *