This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT explains Reasons for delay in pronouncement of order during Lockdown
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ITO Vs Adul Kayum Ahmed Mohd. tamboli (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2009-10
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
ITO Vs Adul Kayum Ahmed Mohd. tamboli (ITAT Mumbai)
The hearing of the matter was concluded on 19/02/2020 and in terms of Rule 34(5) of Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963, the matter was required to be pronounced within a total period of 90 days. As per sub-clause (c) of Rule 34(5), every endeavor was to be made to pronounce the order within 60 days after conclusion of hearing. However, where it is not practicable to do so on the ground of exceptional and extraordinary circumstances, the bench could fix a future date of pronouncement of the order which shall not ordinarily be a day be...
