Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kunal Arora Vs AO (ITAT Amritsar)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kunal Arora Vs AO (ITAT Amritsar) Violation of RBI notification ≠ unexplained income: ITAT Amritsar deletes s.69A on demonetisation cash sales Amritsar   Tribunal allowed Assessee’s appeal & deleted addition of ₹3.66 lakh u/s 69A made on account of deposit of ₹1,000 SBN notes after 25-11-2016 by a petrol pump dealer. Tribunal noted that Assessee maintained regular books of account, cash book was examined in scrutiny, sales, stock movement & GP were accepted, &  the impugned deposits were undisputedly part of recorded cash sales already included in gross turnover of ₹8....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930