Case Law Details

Case Name : Chander Mohan Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 389, 377/Chd/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/10/2014
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (7315) ITAT Chandigarh (163)

Agriculture can be performed only on land and which involve basic operations like tilling of land, sowing of the seeds, planting and similar operations on the land. In case before us no tilling or planting has been done. Admittedly there is no land on which tilling operations etc. is carried out.

As stated by the Assessing Officer the entire activity is carried on as a business in residential area and mushrooms are grown under controlled conditions. The basic operations which are required by an agriculturist on the land are missing in the assessee’s case. Even if, growing of mushroom necessarily involve use of some soil, it could not by itself amount to carrying on a primary agricultural operation in the sense of cultivation of the soil. The assessee has failed to explain as to how it can be claimed that basic agricultural operations were carried out in mushroom production and how expenditure is incurred on primary operations i.e. planting of mushroom etc. and in the secondary operations for preserving it and making it marketable. In the light of these facts in our considered view, the Assessing officer has rightly treated the income from growing of mushroom as non-agricultural income.

 Apart from above there is a further condition that such land should be assessed to land revenue which has also not been fulfilled by the assessee. There is yet another condition that such land should not be situated within Municipal limits whereas the Assessing Officer has given a clear-cut finding that the shed in which mushrooms were grown by the assessee, is located within the residential area of Jagadhari which is situated within Municipal limits. Therefore in view of these facts also the income earned by the assessee from growing of mushrooms cannot be treated as agricultural income. In view of this legal position we uphold the order of the learned Commissioner (Appeals).

Download Judgment/Order

More Under Income Tax


  1. Kavita godse says:

    Yes I agree then on depend for the income and plant at big they use for technical and machinery and grow the mushroom so absulety they payable to the taxes

  2. Hemanth G says:

    I agree with the view that land should be non-converted for agriculture; but it is strange to note that the view taken that the land should be cultivated etc. How about Mr.Fukuwoka who grown tonnes of paddy in his land without doing any basic cultivation, planting seeds, applying menure & pesticides?????? I hope the adjudicating authority will do enough home work before conclude the decisions.

    1. Vipin says:

      Yes i completely​ agreed because in current scenario there are lots of technique introducing day by day for agriculture like hydroponics, production without soil in polyhouses terrace gardening etc.. so surprised decision..

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Posts by Date

October 2020