Incidental benefit to AE doesn’t prove existence of international transaction

ACIT Vs Adidas India Marketing Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)

ITAT Delhi held that the main purpose of incurring of huge AMP expenses has largely benefited assessee in India, with an incidental benefit arising to foreign AE. Hence, it is very difficult to accept existence of an international transaction.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.