Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sadruddin Tejani Vs ITO (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sadruddin Tejani Vs ITO (Bombay High Court)

The basic facts set out above are not in dispute. Without getting into the merits of the demands by the Revenue or the Application for Revision under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act by the Petitioner, it would be relevant to note that, it is not in dispute that Petitioner had filed application under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act for adjustment/credit of Rs.12,43,000/-paid earlier in respect of the tax demands for Assessment Years 1988-89 to 1998-99 as according to him, this amount had been adjusted only

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

Mr.Kapil Goel B.Com(H) FCA LLB, Advocate Delhi High Court advocatekapilgoel@gmail.com, 9910272804 Mr Goel is a bachelor of commerce from Delhi University (2003) and is a Law Graduate from Merrut University (2006) and Fellow member of ICAI (Nov 2004). At present, he is practicing as an Advocate View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reassessment Under Section 147 Invalid When Based on Search Findings Mechanical Approval with Vague and Scanty Reasons is invalid: ITAT Kolkata ITAT should not direct Remand on Legal & Factual Issues: Telangana HC Only Actual Income Earned from Bogus Sale & Purchase can be Taxed as Income Mechanical Approval Under Section 153D Without entry in Order Sheet is Fatal View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930