Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Shri. Sunil Bandacharya Joshi (ITAT Bengaluru)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 703/Bang/2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/06/2018
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ACIT Vs Shri. Sunil Bandacharya Joshi (ITAT Bengaluru)

Undisputedly the assessee had invested in the villa as on 31.03.2011 by paying Rs.1,94,49,302/. However, the quarrel before us is that the amount is not directly invested in purchasing of the villa, rather it is routed through mutual funds. In the considered opinion of the bench what is required u/s.54F of the Act, is the following :

  • That the capital gains must have arisen to the assessee from transfer of the long-term capital asset ;
  • That the assessee within a period of one year before or two years after the date on which the transfer took place has purchased or has within a period of three years after the date had constructed one residential house in India.
  • Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031