Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Shri. Sunil Bandacharya Joshi (ITAT Bengaluru)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ACIT Vs Shri. Sunil Bandacharya Joshi (ITAT Bengaluru)

Undisputedly the assessee had invested in the villa as on 31.03.2011 by paying Rs.1,94,49,302/. However, the quarrel before us is that the amount is not directly invested in purchasing of the villa, rather it is routed through mutual funds. In the considered opinion of the bench what is required u/s.54F of the Act, is the following :

  • That the capital gains must have arisen to the assessee from transfer of the long-term capital as

    Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31