This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Exemption U/s. 54F cannot be denied for investment of amount in Mutual Funds before Purchase of property
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ACIT Vs Shri. Sunil Bandacharya Joshi (ITAT Bengaluru)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2011-12
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ACIT Vs Shri. Sunil Bandacharya Joshi (ITAT Bengaluru)
Undisputedly the assessee had invested in the villa as on 31.03.2011 by paying Rs.1,94,49,302/. However, the quarrel before us is that the amount is not directly invested in purchasing of the villa, rather it is routed through mutual funds. In the considered opinion of the bench what is required u/s.54F of the Act, is the following :
That the capital gains must have arisen to the assessee from transfer of the long-term capital asset ;
That the assessee within a period of one year before or two years after the date on whic...
