Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ajay Kumar Gupta (HUF) Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ajay Kumar Gupta (HUF) Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Conclusion: Since assessee was an HUF and HUF itself could not become a working partner in the partnership firm, therefore, the due date of filing of the return applicable to assessee was 31st July of the relevant assessment year and belated return filed by assessee could not be revised. Held: In the present case, assessee sought to revise belated return filed by it on the ground that it was ‘working partner’ in a firm whose accounts were required to be audited and due date under section 139(1) was 30 the September of the assessment year.It was h...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930