Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sri Arun Kumar Paul Vs ITO, Ward 51(3), Kolkata (ITAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : ITA No.1439/Kol/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/06/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2001-02
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

A perusal of the assessment order clearly shows that the Assessing Officer questioned the assessee why there is a difference in the rate of discount. Assessee replied to the questions raised by the Assessing Officer. However, the Assessing Officer has proceeded to compute the discount by hypothetical calculation to arrive at discount rate for the whole year and then asessee applied on monthly sale basis. This obviously is not permissible in so far as the discount granted by the assessee is not a constant every month. The average rate of discount would be a highly impractical method. In the circumstances, the addition in respect of discount as made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the learned Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals) stands deleted.

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CALCUTTA

ITA No.1439/Kol/2011 – Assessment Year: 2001-02

Sri Arun Kumar Paul

-Versus-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031