Shantaben Ganpatbhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Summary: ITAT Surat partly allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2008-09 concerning compensation of ₹1.70 crore received on compulsory acquisition of land at Hazira on behalf of Essar Steels Ltd. The assessee had not filed a return of income. The Assessing Officer treated the Hazira land as a capital asset within section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and, in an assessment under sections 144 read with 147, made an addition of ₹53,58,334 as long-term capital gains and ₹1,16,41,667 as income from other sources relating to compensation for construction/assets on the land. The CIT(A) partly allowed the assessee’s appeal. Before the Tribunal, there was a delay of 3,675 days. The assessee explained through an affidavit that she was a senior citizen and widow, her son had died in 2010, another son suffered a paralytic attack in 2013, and she was dependent on her grandson. She stated that she became aware of the CIT(A)’s 17.11.2014 order only after a Tax Recovery Officer issued a notice on 10.07.2024 demanding ₹6,65,82,648 and proposing auction of her property. Considering these exceptional circumstances, the Tribunal condoned the delay while expressly stating that the condonation should not be treated as a precedent in other cases.
Want to Read the Complete Judgment?
You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.
Already subscribed? Log in
One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.


