Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Cessation of liability is not income from export & not eligible for deduction u/s. 80HHC

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2007 taxguru.in 32
Case Name
Monte International Vs Commissioner of Income-tax, Ludhiana (Punjab and Hariyana High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement


HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

Monte International

Versus

Commissioner of Income-tax, Ludhiana

IT APPEAL NO. 98 OF 2007†

AUGUST 20, 2007

JUDGMENT

Ajay Kumar Mittal, J.

This appeal is filed by the assessee under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench “B”, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as “the Tribunal”) passed in ITA No. 1231/Chandi/2005 on 31.7.2006 for the assessment year 2001-02. According to the learned counsel for the assessee, the following substantial questions of law arise for consideration of this Court:-

“1.  Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the ITAT was justified in confirming the action of CIT (A) in not allowing legal deduction as claimed by the appellant u/s 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by completely ignoring the established principles of law regarding deeming provisions which provide for applicability of all the enabling provisions once an income is held to be business income either on the basis of its accrual, arising on receipt and/or under deeming provisions?

 2.  Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the ITAT was justified in confirming the action of CIT (A) in not allowing legal deduction as claimed by the appellant u/s 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by completely ignoring the established principles of law regarding deeming provisions though applying the provisions of section 41(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 while on the other hand completely ignoring the true nature of the impugned amount of cessation of liabilities which had resulted in the reduction of purchase price of the raw material and thereby resulting into more Export Profits and thus cannot be denied the impugned deduction u/s 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961?

 3.  Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the findings of ITAT are perverse and against the evidence on record and, thus, unsustainable in law?”

2. Briefly noticed the facts are that the assessee is a partnership firm dealing in Export of thread bar and it filed its income tax return for the assessment year 2001-02 on 30.10.2001 declaring its income as Rs.5,28,855/-. The assessee claimed deduction under section 80HHC of the Act amounting to Rs.19,65,168/-. The details of export sales as well as other incentives including Duty Draw Back are given as under:-

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.