Case Law Details
Godrej Industries Ltd. Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court)
Introduction: In a significant judgment, the Bombay High Court has ruled in favor of Godrej Industries Ltd. against the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT), quashing reassessment notices issued against the company. The case revolved around the contention that the notices were issued beyond the permissible limitation period, making them legally untenable. This decision has considerable implications for the corporate sector, particularly concerning reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Detailed Analysis: The heart of the matter lies in the issuance of a show cause notice under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and subsequent orders and notices which Godrej Industries contended were beyond the jurisdiction due to non-compliance with the statutory limitations defined under Sections 147, 148, 148A, 149, and 151 of the Act.
Godrej Industries raised several grounds challenging the reassessment notices, notably arguing that the notice was issued past the limitation period stipulated in Section 149 of the Act, rendering it invalid. The company also highlighted that there was no ‘information’ warranting a reassessment and that the notices were issued while reassessment proceedings from an earlier notice were still pending, making the new notices illegal.
The Bombay High Court’s decision to quash the reassessment notices was primarily based on the argument related to the limitation period. The court noted that if Godrej succeeded on this preliminary issue, other grounds of challenge would not need examination. After extensive deliberations, the court found that the notices were indeed barred by limitation, citing the amendment to Section 149 and its interpretation by various high courts, including the precedents set by the Calcutta and Rajasthan High Courts.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
