Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Raj Bala Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Raj Bala and Joginder Dahiya Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

AO recording reasons on same returned income considering escaped assessment but making various other additions of other than accepted returned income declared invalid and deleted in light of Explanation 3 and held issuance of fresh notice u/s 148 on other issues is mandatory.

Since, in the instant case, the AO had initiated proceedings u/s 147 for escapement of income of Rs.9,43,897/- which was the returned income filed prior to issue of notice u/s 148

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

Mr.Kapil Goel B.Com(H) FCA LLB, Advocate Delhi High Court advocatekapilgoel@gmail.com, 9910272804 Mr Goel is a bachelor of commerce from Delhi University (2003) and is a Law Graduate from Merrut University (2006) and Fellow member of ICAI (Nov 2004). At present, he is practicing as an Advocate View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reassessment Under Section 147 Invalid When Based on Search Findings Mechanical Approval with Vague and Scanty Reasons is invalid: ITAT Kolkata ITAT should not direct Remand on Legal & Factual Issues: Telangana HC Only Actual Income Earned from Bogus Sale & Purchase can be Taxed as Income Mechanical Approval Under Section 153D Without entry in Order Sheet is Fatal View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930