Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Addition U/s. 69 justified if assessee cannot furnish any explanation regarding source of receipt of money

Case Law Details

Case Name
K.L. Prasada Rao Vs. ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2011-12
Advertisement K.L. Prasada Rao Vs. ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam) Neither before the assessing officer nor before the learned Commissioner (Appeals), the assessee could prove the source of investment, in fact, no explanation was offered. Thus, additional evidence filed for the first time, cannot be entertained, more particularly on the ground that even the confirmation letters are not sufficient to prove the investment. It is the duty of the assessee to prove the creditworthiness of the parties also, which is absent in the instant case. Having regard to these circumstances, the addition made by ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *