This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Addition U/s. 69 justified if assessee cannot furnish any explanation regarding source of receipt of money
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- K.L. Prasada Rao Vs. ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2011-12
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Visakhapatnam
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
K.L. Prasada Rao Vs. ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
Neither before the assessing officer nor before the learned Commissioner (Appeals), the assessee could prove the source of investment, in fact, no explanation was offered. Thus, additional evidence filed for the first time, cannot be entertained, more particularly on the ground that even the confirmation letters are not sufficient to prove the investment. It is the duty of the assessee to prove the creditworthiness of the parties also, which is absent in the instant case. Having regard to these circumstances, the addition made by ...




